|
For Release: May 4, 2004
New Report:
Changes to National Forest Protections Threaten 9.5 Million
Acres of Pristine Wild Forests in Montana and Idaho
For More Information:
Phil Knight, Native Forest Network (Bozeman, Montana): 406.586.3885
Matthew Koehler, Native Forest Network (Missoula, Montana):
406.542.7343
Gary Macfarlane, Friends of the Clearwater (Idaho): 208.882.9755
MISSOULA, MONTANA - A
report released today by the Native Forest Network and
Friends of the Clearwater found that 9.5 million acres of
Montana and Idaho's pristine national forests could be made
available for logging and road-building if the Bush administration
reverses policies put into place in the 2001 Roadless Area
Conservation Rule.
The Roadless Rule is designed to protect the last intact one-third
of the nation's roadless forests from road-building, mining
and logging. The administration has already exempted America's
largest National Forest - Alaska's Tongass Rainforest - from
the rule, and has announced its intentions to revise the rule
as it applies to the rest of the nation's forests.
The Native Forest Network and Friends of the Clearwater released
the report today to mark the anniversary of Agriculture Secretary
Ann M. Veneman's May 4, 2001, pledge to uphold the provisions
of the Roadless Rule. Despite her pledge, Ms. Veneman's subordinate,
Agriculture Undersecretary Mark E. Rey, recently said changes
to the rule were imminent. Environmental groups expect the
changes will follow the Bush Administration's practice to
date of favoring well-heeled logging interests at the expense
of protecting forests for future generations.
The report profiles roadless areas within the Montana and
Idaho national forests that have been lost due to logging
and road-building prior to the creation of the Roadless Rule,
and identifies several roadless areas that could meet a similar
fate if the Roadless Rule is reversed. According to the report,
there are already 67,000 miles of roads traversing the Montana
and Idaho's national forest lands, more than six times the
amount of roads in Montana and Idaho's state highway system.
The maintenance backlog for these roads already exceeds $1.3
million.
"The Bush administration has worked relentlessly on behalf
of industrial logging corporations to gut the Roadless Rule
and open our last intact public forests in Montana and Idaho
to logging and road-building," said Phil Knight with
the Native Forest Network. "This report shows changes
to the Roadless Rule would be devastating to Montana and Idaho's
national forests, putting 60 percent of our roadless acres
at risk."
"Roadless areas in Montana and Idaho are crucial habitat
for salmon, steelhead, and bull trout. Not only do they provide
clean water, but prime wildlife habitat and places citizens
can escape the din of industrial society," said Gary
Macfarlane of Friends of the Clearwater. "Protecting
them is part of our duty to the nation's cultural and natural
heritage."
Late last year, the Bush administration exempted the Tongass
National Forest from the rule in a stealth move two days before
Christmas. The administration has also stated its intent to
strip federal protections for other wild forests. During testimony
before the House Resources Committee on March 3rd, 2004, Chief
Dale N. Bosworth indicated that the Forest Service intends
to propose changes to weaken the Roadless Rule in the Lower
48 states and the Chugach National Forest in Alaska. According
to Agriculture Undersecretary Mark E. Rey, those changes could
be announced this month.
The Roadless Rule is a landmark conservation initiative enacted
in 2001 to protect 58.5 million acres of roadless areas in
our national forests from most logging and road-building.
The Roadless Rule enjoys widespread support. Members of Congress,
major corporations such as Staples, outdoor retailers such
as REI, hundreds of gun groups in states such as Pennsylvania
and Michigan and Governors from New Mexico, Virginia, Maine,
Washington, and Pennsylvania have announced their opposition
to changes to the rule. To date, nearly 2.5 million positive
comments have been received on the rule by the federal government.
|